for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Biomass (Pellets, Energy crops, Agricultural residues)
Biogas/biomethane production
Anaerobic digestion technologies
Chemical energy
Gaseous fuels
Open-field agriculture, Livestock, Greenhouses
Energy generator, Advisory services, Policy makers, Industry
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Solid biomass
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Makul, Fediuk, Amran, Petropavlovskaya, Sulman
Journal: Materials
Journal link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/materials
Publication date: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216482
Article link: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/21/6482
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
Russian Science Foundation (project No. 21-79-30004)
Author location: Thailand
Authors` other locations: Poland, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Yemen
Corresponding author email: fedyuk.rs@dvfu.ru
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.