for Energy efficiency improvement
Conservation agriculture
No/minimum tillage
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Advisory services, Policy makers
Agricultural field practices
Tilling/ploughing
Methodology
Authors: Mehdi Moradi, Mohammad Amin Nematollahi, Amin Mousavi Khaneghah, Seyyed Hassan Pishgar-Komleh, Mohammad Reza Rajabi
Journal: Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Journal link: https://www.springer.com/journal/11356
Publication date: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3424-x
Article link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30338468/
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
94GRD1M215809/the Research Affairs Office of Shiraz University
3240274290/CNPq-TWAS Postgraduate Fellowship
Author location: Iran
Authors` other locations: Azerbaijan, Brazil, Poland
Corresponding author email: mousavi.amin@gmail.com
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.