for Energy efficiency improvement
Efficient tool
Irrigation (pumps, drip systems etc)
Open-field agriculture, Livestock, Greenhouses
Farmer, Producers association, Advisory services, Policy makers
Agricultural field practices
Irrigation
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Mindú, Capece, Araújo, Oliveira
Journal: Sustainability (Switzerland)
Journal link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability
Publication date: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910998
Article link: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10998
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
National Funds through the Portuguese funding agency, FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, within project UIDB/50014/2020
Author location: Mozambique
Authors` other locations: Portugal
Corresponding author email: amindu@up.ac.mz
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.