for Soil carbon sequestration
Soil and water conservation techniques
Open-field agriculture
Advisory services, Policy makers, Companies, Industry
Agricultural field practices
Fertilizing
Methodology, Procedure, Other
Authors: He, Liu, Wang, Huete, Yu
Journal: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/agriculture-ecosystems-and-environment
Publication date: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108536
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880923001950
Open access: No
Article funding source:
NSW Climate Change Fund, NSW Primary Industries, National Natural Science Foundation of China and China Scholarship Council
Author location: Australia
Authors` other locations: China
Corresponding author email: de.li.liu@dpi.nsw.gov.au
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.